Sunday, September 8, 2013

Remembering the past to advance the Oromo struggle forward

By Kadiro A. Elemo*
The Oromo people, the single largest ethnic group in the Horn of Africa, with the third widely spoken language in Africa after Arabic and Hausa, were incorporated into the Ethiopian Empire in the second half of the 19th century by successive conquests undertaken by Abyssinian emperors. Prior to the conquests, the Oromo, a nation of the free, elected their leaders democratically according to the Gadaasystem, one of the egalitarian systems they contributed to the world civilization. The British diplomat Walter Plowden remarked that ‘Gadaa is superior among republican systems’ and Gadaa government “as pure as a republic can exist.” Similarly, an Eritrean anthropologist, Asmarom Legesse, describedGadaa as “the most astonishing and instructive turns [in] the evolution of human society.” Bulatovich, who traveled through the Oromo land, described Oromo’s republican system as “the peaceful, free way of life, which could have become the ideal for philosophers and writers of the eighteenth century [Europe], if they had known of it.”
In addition to their democratic systems, the Oromo are known for their hard work. A U.S. diplomat, Robert Skinner, who visited Ethiopia by the beginning of the 19th century, dubbed the Oromo as a “race of excellent intelligence … industrious farmers and safe citizens.” Having extensively traveled throughout the Horn of Africa, Augustus Wylde came to a conclusion that “No harder worker than the [Oromo] peasant of Abyssinia exits,” and in contrast, he also put that “No more truculent, worthless, conceited, lazy, useless creature than the Abyssinian soldier.”
In addition to their hardworking etiquette, the Oromo are a peace-loving and good neighborly society, who invented a mechanism for en masse assimilation of aliens, even including their antagonists. Famous for their peace-loving manners and ubiquitous peace rituals, the British anthropologist Paul Baxter referred to the Oromo as a people of “a river of blessing.” Professor Donald Levine described the Oromo as sociable, tolerant, democratic, egalitarian, welcoming, and respectful, and communal, and he found Oromo qualities antithesis to Amara qualities of secrecy, suspicion, individualism, and authoritarianism. The Oromo also have such enormous love for trees, mountains, and rivers that helped them to develop such a pervasive concept of honor and respect for mother earth.
Inasmuch as the Oromo valued congenial environment with their neighbors, they were intrepid warriors who defended their land, resources, and dignity against invaders for centuries before the European firepower changed the regional power equilibrium. Fascinated by Oromo’s productivity and awesome military formations, some European missionaries, who visited Northeast Africa prior to the Scramble for Africa, were convinced that the Oromo would play a central role in the future of the Horn of Africa. Whereas the German Protestant missionary Johann Ludwig Krapf equated the Oromo to “Germans of Africa” if they would embrace Christianity, the French Catholic missionary Martial de Salviac likened the Oromos to the “French of Africa if they would be converted to Christianity.” Despite the fact that the Oromo demonstrated that they were bearers of indigenous civilizations and prodigious workers, the Oromo failed to pass the litmus test of the so-called civilization, Christianity. No wonder then, even, for admirers of the Oromo (such as Krapf and de Salviac), the ability of the Oromo to administer themselves and succeed as a nation was viable only through the agency of Christianity.
During the European Scramble for Africa, unlike the rest of Africa, the major contenders for the continent, Britain and France, reached a deadlock in the race for controlling Northeast Africa. Themodus operandi of the time favored dealing with a certain king or patriarch than dealing with egalitarian (and a polycephalous) societies like the Oromo – whose Executive Branch holder changes periodically. In proxy battles for an influence in the area, therefore, the Imperial Europe provided weapons for various warring Abyssinian factions – considering that the Christian Abyssinians were custodians of “superior” civilization and excellent slave dealers (as well as looters), who were capable to pay Europeans back for their death machines. Proximity to the sea, hierarchical nature of the Abyssinians, the slave trade and Christianity helped the Abyssinians to acquire an enormous amount of weapons from Europe.
At this junction, the destiny of the freedom loving Oromo nation, who were masters of their destiny and “did not recognize [external] authority other than the speed of his horse, the strength of his hand, and the accuracy of his spear,” as Bulatovich described, began to change like elsewhere in Africa.
When Europeans turned the Christian Abyssinia into a storehouse of modern weapons, the biggest beneficiary from the floodgate of the weapons was none other than Emperor Minilik, who amassed 1 million rifles and 47 million cartridges of ammunition. Emboldened by possession of a formidable firepower, the juggernaut Minilik declared to the world that Abyssinia had officially joined the Scramble for Africa. “I have no intention to being an indifferent spectator,” arrogantly proclaimed Emperor Minilik, “while far distant powers make their appearance with the intentions of carving out their respective empires in Africa.” His lust of conquest was unmatched, “I shall endeavor, if God gives me life and strength, to reestablish the ancient frontiers of Ethiopia up to Khartoum, and as far as Lake Nyanza with all the [Oromos].” The emperor vigorously led the Abyssinian expansion into the lush green of the south to export the Abyssinian “civilization,” the civilization that brought an industrial scale massacres, the slave trade, and destruction of Africa’s indigenous civilizations.
Therefore, Emperor Minilik’s army, which is often compared to the biblical locust of Egypt because of its looting and destruction, conquered Oromiya with unparalleled and untold brutalities and destruction. While the Abyssinian marching army destroyed the green lush of Oromiya, the conquests over-flooded Finfinne, his capital, with food-surpluses in the middle of an apocalyptic famine — Kifu Qan. Indeed, Finfinne was nicknamed a “Noah’s Ark” since it was the only escape from the famine, which ravaged ninety percent of cattle population of the country and consumed countless of human lives. Once the masters of Northeast Africa, the Oromo lost their land to Abyssinian settler warriors, sold into slavery, robbed of their resources, and denied the right to enjoy their culture. Lost their dear self-identification, the Oromo were called by a derogatory appellation, and even worse, their humanity was questioned. The empire portrayed the Oromo as “invaders” (or a “curse” of God to spoil beautiful alpines of Abyssinia), who subdued once the Christian Abyssinia recovered from her lapse into savagery they brought. These were the trends and behaviors subsequent Abyssinian rulers followed and strengthened.
The Oromo never accepted an alien rule imposed on them and continued to resist their incorporation into the Ethiopian Empire. They fought in different ways in various regions of Oromiya against the occupiers who ransacked their property and derided their culture. Nevertheless, the once remarkable military formations of the Oromo hardly matched the Abyssinian army armed with European death machines. De Salviac described a scene in Oromiya during the conquests as “the theatre of a great massacre,” and “the charming Oromo land … ploughed by the iron and the fire; flooded with blood and the orgy of pillage.” Bulatovich termed it, “[T]he dreadful annihilation of more than half the population during the conquest took away from the [Oromo].” Emperor Minilik, who managed to defeat a European power using the European technology, liquidated a solid five million Oromo, half of the entire Oromo population, at the time, according to accounts of European travelers and missionaries.
The Oromo, a nation of brave warriors, put a ferocious resistance against Abyssinia, an empire in which a political, cultural, economic, social, and religious power expressed through the use of gun, the naftanya system. Against all odds, the Oromo survived the Abyssinian genocide and ethnic cleansing. Alike a Phoenix, the Oromo always regenerate and rise from the ashes, with more vigor, whenever the Abyssinians believed that they had broken their indomitable spirit. However, the enemy tried, for more than a century, to destroy the Oromo culture and Oromummaa, the Oromo are still the largest ethnic group in Ethiopia, and their once banned language is still one of the biggest languages spoken in the African continent. As a young activist Toltu Tufa said, “A language whose music and words were once forbidden still wets the tongues of [over] 40 million people.” This happened because of uninterrupted struggles of brave sons and daughters Oromiya.
During the Napier’s conquest, the Wallo Oromo played a crucial role in defeating Emperor Tewodros, a symbolic founder of the modern Abyssinian Empire, by laying siege to his citadel and turning him a virtual captive in the middle of the very people whom he considered “invaders” and vowed to “throw” from Abyssinia. There is a contentious claim that brave warriors of an Oromo queen killed the emperor, while he holed up, in the fortress, and hunkered down for writing lengthy letters to seek an honorable settlement with Napier. No wonder then the British forces came to Tewodros’ hideout without a single gunshot except storming the fortress. Whereas Tewodros butchered all Oromo captives (he released all non-Oromo prisoners), the Oromo, who surrounded the fort on the call of General Napier, showed an extraordinary sense of humanity and civility. They neither killed nor did they harm a single of Tewodros’ soldiers, running in disarray, except surrendering and handing them to the British forces.
In 1870 and 1880s, the Wallo Oromo resisted the occupation, massacres, forceful conversion and evictions of Emperor Yohannes, who died in the hands of Mahdist Sudan while he was trying to execute the British colonial agenda in return for a piece of land in Eritrea and weapons to reinforce his iron fist control on the Oromo country of Wallo.
Equally, the Arsi Oromo checked the Minilik army relentless onslaughts for six years, in which about 100,000 gallant Oromo heroes and heroines lost their dear lives in defense of the motherland. At one time, Minilik and his wife barely managed to escape in one of the ferocious battles. To break their resistance, the conquering army engaged in amputations, beheading, summary executions, and poisoning of water wells. If it is not called genocide, that it was, Arsi peasants have coined a term for the sheer slaughtering of the conquerors, “warradomsa,” a people who kill until a knife turns dull.
When the Minilik army tried to occupy the Oromo country of Ittu and Humbanna, the Oromo annihilated them on their first bid until the Abyssinian marching army of 10,000 riflemen defeated the poorly organized peasant army at the Battle of Calanqo.
During the Italian conquest, the rebellious Rayya Asabo defeated Hayla Sillase’s army and killed his minister of war in March 1936. The uprisings of Oromo peasants, in different parts of Oromiya, dealt a deathblow to the staggering Empire before even the Italians controlled Finfinnee. In fact, thirty-three Oromo leaders sought recognition and protection from the abeyant international community after forming the ‘Western Oromo Confederation.’
Whereas the Italian occupation, as Professor John Markakis said, “brought welcome relief from the burden of Ethiopian rule to the people of the periphery,” Hayla Sillase re-instituted the same exploitative systems when he restored to power with British bayonets. The Oromo in Bale, Borana, Hararghe, Guji, Jimma, among others, rose to fight the restoration of the naftanya system, but only to be crushed by contingents of British army from Kenya and Sudan.
The Era of Modern Resistance and General Waqo Gutu
Whereas the resistances of the Oromo were sporadic and ephemeral in nature, the Oromo began to put organized and unified civic and military resistances in the early 1960s, which gave rise to the birth of the modern Oromo consciousness and nationalism. In 1963, when the exploitation and abuses of Hayla Sillase administration went through the roof, the Oromo rose to assert their right for equality, freedom, and self-determination. The year witnessed the birth of Maccaa-Tuulamaa Self-help Association and the Oromo student activism for the betterment of the lives of their masses. In the same year, the Oromo in Bale region, in a close alliance with various Oromo and Somali clans, under the leadership of General Waqo Gutu Usu, launched a military resistance to check the exploitation and oppression of the empire. Born in 1924, from the Rayitu clan of Arsi, in the Holy City of Madda Walabu, Bale, General Waqo sparked the armed resistance of the Oromo people against the Ethiopia army, the most mechanized army in the entire African continent. His fighters either controlled or made ungovernable most part of the southern Oromiya in the Ethiopian Empire for a decade until they yielded to the military pressure in the early 1970s, having placed the Oromo struggle in the political map of Ethiopia.
Remembering the legacy of General Waqo Gutu
The year 2013 marks the 50th anniversary of the Oromo’s struggle to end the era of political oppression, cultural subjugation, and economic exploitation, and the era to reclaim our past glory. Thanks to sacrifices of our heroes and heroines, who gave us a privilege and an honor they never had, today, we learn in Afaan Oromoo, the Oromo language, and proudly call ourselves we are the Oromo. Proud of our identity, we, the Qubee generation, are, at a special milieu, to realize what our ancestors started a century ago, to end tribulations and exploitation of our people, poverty and disease. This journey begins by celebrating the legacy of those heroes and heroines, who gave their dear lives in pioneering the struggle of our people. A Holocaust once survivor said, “Without memory, there is no culture. Without memory, there would be no civilization, no society, [and] no future.”
On October 20, 2013, in Minnesota, the Oromo will come together in a commemoration of the 50th year anniversary of the modern Oromo military struggle against the Ethiopian rule.
On the commemoration, we sing songs of freedom, emancipation, unity, love, happiness, better tomorrow, and above all, we vow to finish what our heroes and heroines started more than a century ago. Please join us as we shall celebrate the legacy of our heroes and heroines, and reflect on their significance for this generation to advance the Oromo cause.
* The writer, Kadiro A. Elemo, is a Chicago-based author. His new book, ”The United States and Ethiopia: The Tragedy of Human Rights,” is now available on Amazon.com.

Demonstration in Norway on September 14, 2013

tesfahun
The Oromo Youth Movement in Norway, together with Oromo nationalists has finished its preparation to hold demonstration on Saturday September 14, 2013
Place: From Oslo Central Station to Parliament
Time: 13:00-16:00
The Object of the demonstration,
  • Condemning the cold blooded massacre of our people by TPLF/EPRDF federal police in Kofale town, Arsi Zone of Oromia Region.
  • Call for a Reversal of Racial and Politically Motivated Sentences of the Oromo university students by the TPLF/ EPRDF.
  • Condemning the escalating human rights violation, Land grabbing and the ethnic cleansing of the Oromos by Leyu Police of the EPDRF in Harage
  • Mourning candle Program for the death of the Oromo activist Engineer Tesfahun Chamada in Kaliti Prison in a horrible & inhuman torturing by the Ethiopian government.
We call for all Oromo and the supporters of Oromo to join us on this historical event.
Contacts:
Email : Oromofirst.Oromiya@gmail.com
Tel. +4794724502/ +4746723604

Debunking the Illusions and Confusions of Narrow Ethiopianism

Barii Ayano | September 8, 2013
  1. 1.     Introduction
The current onslaught of the so-called “Ethiopianist” camps on Oromo political activists and Oromos’ national cause has created an opportunity that we must not forgo. Professor Hamdesa Tuso’s article titled “The Demise of the Mythical Ethiopia”, which was published in 1991, was a groundbreaking article that shaped many Oromos’ political perspective about Ethiopia both its real and mythical nature. (See the link below http://www.hamdesatuso.com/Myths-Ethio.pdf)
The current situation, “I am Oromo First” movement, has given us an opportunity to explain the real nature of the so-called Ethiopianist parties to the Oromo and other oppressed people’s youth. The ongoing overt and covert discussions about the issue are debunking the illusions and confusions embodied in narrow Ethiopianism.  I will raise some of the points of ongoing discussions in three-part series.
  1. 2.     Narrow Ethiopianism is Not Multinationalism
Although there are few exceptions in the so-called Ethiopianist circles, the overwhelming majority of Ethiopianists are proponents of narrow Ethiopianism. Their Ethiopianism is narrow in a sense that it does not accommodate the interests as well as the diversity of nations and nationalities living in the Ethiopian Empire. Actually, whether narrow Ethiopianists talk about unity, democracy, history, politics, culture, language, etc., their inherent goal is crystal clear. It is a theme to deny the very existence of the causes of nations and nationalities in the Ethiopian Empire.
However, one of the confusions the so-called narrow Ethiopianist sustained for years is acting as if they were multinational parties. The closer look at them clearly shows that they’re anti-thesis to multinationalism. In fact, narrow Ethiopianism is waging sustained political, cultural, linguistic, etc. wars on multinational and diverse nature of the Ethiopian Empire. It is a perpetual war against diverse interest groups that make up the Ethiopian Empire. Simply put, narrow Ethiopianism is a multifaceted war on multinationalism and multiculturalism in the Ethiopian Empire. It’s antithesis to reconciliation and peaceful coexistence of diversities that make up Ethiopia.
Thus it’s crystal clear that the so-called “Ethiopianist” parties are not multinationals, except for their names, as if they were representing the interests of all groups. They neither represent nor defend multinationalism or multiculturalism in the Ethiopian Empire. Narrow Ethiopianists create illusions of multinational parties while in fact they work tirelessly to destroy the very diversity of Ethiopia in all ways they can. Thus it is not only misnomer but also absurd to classify narrow Ethiopianism as multinationalism. Everything narrow Ethiopianists do is against multinationalism.
The “Ethiopian” pride they preach also does not include a pride about multinational Ethiopia. For instance, the oppressed people’s cultures, languages, and the democratic Gadaa system are not accounted as part of the Ethiopian pride that need promoting or saving. There is no Ethiopianist party that even promotes multiculturalism.
  1. 3.     Denies the Very Existence of Nations and Nationalities in Ethiopia
Narrow Ethiopianism is a distortion that reduces nations and nationalities in Ethiopia into mere tribes. Denial of the existence of the causes of nations and nationalities drive their political programs and agendas for the future. They reject the natural rights for self-determination since they pretend that they are the only ones who decide the fate of all people in the Ethiopian Empire. Even their democratic rhetoric does not depend on the democratic motto of “live and let live”, which fosters healthy political competitions on the basis of public will and choice. They don’t even want to let individuals establish any organization that bears the name of a nation or a nationality. They want to criminalize and destroy all political parties and other organizations that claim to represent the interests of nations and nationalities.  And yet, they claim that they are multinational parties that stand for the interests of all people in the Ethiopian Empire.
Thus narrow Ethiopianists are not searching for the middle ground that builds reconciliation and peaceful coexistence in Ethiopia or the region. They still operate with the conquering feudal warlords’ mentality, and hence they don’t believe other nations and nationalities’ cultures and languages are worth saving or are part of the so-called Ethiopian pride. Rather, they want to get rid of them to “build” Ethiopia.
Narrow Ethiopianists don’t feel the historical and ongoing pains and tribulations of the oppressed people either. It’s an extremist camp that defends domination and control of the oppressed people. Narrow Ethiopianists deny the past and ongoing political, cultural, economic, etc. misdeeds against conquered nations and nationalities. Rather, they celebrate those who perpetuated multitudes of crimes and human rights abuses against nations and nationalities as their heroes and heroines.  It’s a political drama hiding under the name Ethiopia to pursue the failed political goal of assimilating all nations and nationalities in the Ethiopian Empire into the urbanized (garrison town) Amhara culture and language. It’s not rooted in rural Amhara regions either.
It’s wrong to describe them, based on their false claims, that narrow Ethiopianist political entities are “hibre beher” (multinational).  Whenever they talk about Ethiopia, including in terms of unity and democracy, they don’t think in terms of equality of the diverse nations and nationalities in the Ethiopian Empire. They have the mindset of conquerors (colonizers) who impose their own culture and language at the expense of those of the conquered nations and nationalities.
Once an individual from oppressed nations and nationalities clearly sees the illusions and confusions embodied in narrow Ethiopianism, her/his perspectives about the so-called Ethiopianist parties won’t be the same; it is a revelation. It becomes a fundamental political awakening about the Ethiopian Empire and its core problems. There is no mystery that narrow Ethiopianism hides under the name of Ethiopia, unity or democracy. Narrow Ethiopianism is merely promoting urbanized Amhara culture and Amharic at the expense of other cultures and languages in the Ethiopian Empire. It is the extension of Imperial regimes’ plan of controlling and exploiting Ethiopia by the process of assimilating nations and nationalities in Ethiopia under one culture and one language dogma. In other words, it’s a continuation of the old Imperial Systems policy that was tried and failed the Ethiopian Empire. Actually, it’s the foundation of the political, economic, cultural, etc. problems that ravaged Ethiopia for over hundred years. To put it in simple terms, the root problem cannot be a solution. And it does not matter whether it’s honey-coated and polished. Many can see through it. If honesty prevails and truth dictates the course, narrow Ethiopianism merely makes Ethiopianist politics less attractive to the youth that hails from the oppressed nations and nationalities. The evidences are already in. Of course, it asks courage to face the truth. Narrow Ethiopianists have none of it. They live in their heads more than the reality on the ground in the real Ethiopia-the very essence of narrow Ethiopianism.
Moreover, narrow Ethiopianism is the most stagnant and arrogant political ideology of conquering/colonizing and dominating others. They covertly support TPLF/EPRDF regime’s attack on nations and nationalities while overtly opposing the very existence of what they call ethnic federalism. Crimes TPLF gangsters commit on oppressed nations and nationalities don’t get any attention from the narrow Ethiopianists.
Narrow Ethiopianism is rooted in the feudal warlord politics of conquerors (colonizers). Its foundation is politics of garrison towns established in conquered areas of the Ethiopian Empire. (This will be elaborated in the second part of the discussion points)
Note:
Hemdesa Tuso, The Demise of the Mythical Ethiopia, The Oromo Commentary, 1991, Nos. 2 and 3.

London, England: Public Rally for Oromo Human Rights and Freedom – September 13, 2013

The Oromo Community in the UK organized a public protest (rally) to protest and expose crimes against humanity by the current regime in Ethiopia, and seek justice for the victims. This protest aims to inform the international community not only to stop aiding the perpetrators, but also hold them accountable for planning and carrying out sustained crimes against humanity on the Oromo people.
Gadaa.com
Over the past two decades, thousands of unarmed civilians: students, human rights activists, political figures of all age, have been subjected to uninterrupted extrajudicial killings, mass arrests, tortures, kidnapping and disappearances etc. The recent killing of Tesfahn Chemeda, who was kidnapped in Kenya after being extradited back to Ethiopia, is one tragic example. Alemayehu Gerba was gunned down in the same way as Tesfahun while in prison. The continued harassment of Muslim community and killings of people in Kofele and other parts of Ethiopia demonstrated the scale of government brutality against the people, and its obsession to control and lead through its agents even in the faith groups – which has already been proved in the Orthodox church since the regime assumed power.
Gadaa.com
Hundreds of Oromo students have been killed, thousands of Oromo political activists, such as Mr. Bekele Gerba and Mr. Olbana Lelisa, were jailed for trumped up crimes while many others were killed. The mass dismissal of Oromo students from schools and the eviction of peasants from their livelihood, and the influx of Oromo refugees, who are arriving in Yemen in tens of thousands each month, is a worrying sign showing the unbearable yolk of repression that could ignite civil unrest in the country sometime soon. It is noteworthy that even refugees are hunted down like animals in neighboring countries and beyond. In the same way as Tesfahun Chemeda, many have been tracked down and harassed; others are killed in countries where they sought asylum including in Kenya, Somalia and South Africa.
The political, economic and social mess the regime has created a situation whereby it can’t hand over power through democratic mechanisms without holding its officials accountable for their crimes. TPLF cadres and its supporters are given exclusive control over political power, have preferential treatment in business and the entire economy of the country but at the cost of others. It is time to act before it is too late and let the international community know the extent of the crisis.
All who stand for justice and respect of human rights and freedoms of the oppressed people, and wish to see the end of this repression shall come out and take part in this rally. “The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people but the silence over that by the good people.” (Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.)
Place: Old Palace Yard, SW1 opposite to the West Minister building,
Date: September 13, 2013
Time: 01:00pm – 5:30pm
Stand up for justice and freedom!

Saturday, September 7, 2013

Displacement Follows Clashes On Kenya-Ethiopia Border


Inter-clan violence continues to cause death and destruction (file photo)
Inter-clan violence continues to cause death and destruction (file photo)
MOYALE, 6 September 2013 (IRIN) – Thousands of families remain displaced from the northern Kenya district of Moyale, close to the Ethiopian border, following the latest spate of clan violence, which has left at least two dozen dead since it broke out on 30 August.
Aid agencies say they have been unable to conduct a comprehensive assessment of humanitarian needs, essential for providing emergency assistance to populations in some of the district’s more volatile areas. 
Two days of inter-clan fighting among the Gabra, Burji and Borana communities saw houses torched, gunfire exchanged and business come to a standstill in the areas of Somare and Teti. The violence has since subsided, but tension remains high in the area.
Education officials say all 32 primary and secondary schools in Moyale remained closed on 2 September, as all both teachers and students remained displaced, too afraid of renewed violence to return home.
The violence is believed to be part of a series of revenge attacks that began when the Borana and Gabra clashed on 15 July, leaving one dead and three wounded.
Displaced
“More than 38,000 people from 6,381 households have been forced to leave their homes,” said the Kenya Red Cross Society’s (KRCS) Moyale coordinator, Stephen Bonaya, who noted that most of the displaced had crossed into Ethiopia, while others were staying with relatives in Moyale and the counties of Marsabit and Wajir.
He said scores of children, women and men were still separated from their families, while others were missing. “A team is helping families trace lost members and reunite them. At the moment, 60 families have been united,” he added.
According to Bonaya, displaced families are in urgent need of food assistance, shelter, drugs, water, cooking utensils, clothing and mosquito nets, among other things.
Moyale’s traders say the suspension of operations by transporters has led to a spike in food prices in the area.
“My lorry has been parked for a whole week now. I am afraid it could either be burnt or hijacked, and yet I am supposed to service a loan,” said Golicha, a truck owner.
Ismail Adan, a livestock trader and a transporter, said the prices of hiring and ferrying livestock by lorries doubled as a result of the clashes. “It’s not possible to make any profit from livestock trade. Animals at the market are too few and very expensive,” he said.
Seeking a solution
Historically, the regions’ communities – which straddle Kenya and Ethiopia – have fought over resources such as pasture and water for their livestock, butresearch by Tufts University and KRCS shows that the violence has recently become more deadly and communities and their leaders now seek to achieve control over these resources through the political system.
“The government is now in charge. Militia gangs from the warring communities have been flushed out [by the police and the army],” Marsabit County commissioner Isaiah Nakoru told IRIN. “Some have fled and crossed the border. We have arrested eight Ethiopians, two Kenya[ns]. The state is serious; nobody will escape punishment… Politicians responsible will not be spared.”
He added that preliminary investigations had established that “foreign militia” armed with mortars and bombs had fuelled the fighting.
People affected by the conflict say the intermittent violence will continue unless the government addresses the root causes, involving the warring communities and their leaders.
“This is a political problem. Neither Kenya’s entire military nor police can contain or end this problem. Arrest the politicians, involve all communities in the political process and share resources fairly,” said one Moyale resident, who preferred anonymity.
Former national assembly speaker Francis Ole Kaparo said a peaceful solution to the conflict needed to be found. “These communities must stop this bloody way of resolving disputes and share them [resources] or lose all anticipated benefits,” he told IRIN.

A prisoner of conscience's call for sanctions against Ethiopia

European aid has transformed my country's economy but also props up one-party rule. Let EU donors give us democracy

Eskinder Nega

Ethiopia Elections
Ethiopian women wait to cast their votes in May 2010. European election observers said that the election fell short of international standards. Photograph: Jerome Delay/AP

To Ethiopia's archaic left, which dominates the ruling party, the new euphemism for the west is neoliberal. Compared to the jargon of bygones days – imperialists – when Lenin and Mao were still in vogue, neoliberal sounds decidedly wimpy. But this hardly matters to Ethiopia's ruling party. What it seeks is a bogeyman to tamp down rising expectations for multiparty democracy.
To this end, plying nationalist sentiment is the easy option. And so, we get a tale of heroes and villains in which there is a defender of national ethos, honor and economic growth (inevitably, the ruling party), and a foreign horde bent on subversion, domination and economic exploitation (infallibly, the west: the neoliberals).
In this narrative, Ethiopia's recent economic growth, amidst a global slump, is ascribed to the stability afforded by one-party rule, as in China – and not, as many experts are prone to point out, the generosity of donor countries. Hence the paradox of well-intentioned European money promoting Chinese interests in one of the more important economies in Africa.
Aggregate aid is to the Ethiopian economy what Obama's fiscal stimulus was to the American economy: minus these injections, both economics would suffer catastrophically. The theatrical blustering of the Ethiopian government notwithstanding, donor countries have a make-or-break power over the Ethiopa's prosperity.
And European aid has done wonderful things in Ethiopia. Despite the government's ingratitude, we – the disenfranchised majority – are grateful and appreciative. We have improved access to schools, health facilities and roads because of donor benevolence. But an aid policy tied only to economic and social needs is only half complete; a comprehensive approach entails a linkage with politics.
Ideally, aid should have an impact on GDP growth. Ethiopia now ranks in the world's top ten fastest-growing economies, the pride of Eurocrats. But aid should also increase trade between donor and recipient, as was the case with US aid to Europe under the Marshall Plan. By this measure, Europe has failed. Ethiopian trade with China has exploded, while stagnating or shrinking with Europe. Again, China wins without lifting a finger.
Aid should also strengthen democratic institutions. Here is where European donors' policy falters dramatically. The unintended consequence of indifference to democratic accountability translates into the subsidy and reinforcement of tyranny. The time for reassessment has come.
After two decades of one-party rule, Ethiopia is visibly aching for change. Even the traditionally placid Sufi Muslim community is increasingly restless. There is clear danger of communal strife.
As a prisoner of conscience committed to peaceful transition to democracy, I urge Europe to apply economic sanctions against Ethiopia. What short-term pain may result will be compensated by long-term gain. A pledge to re-engage energetically with a democratic Ethiopia would act as a catalyst for reform.
Sanctions need to be targeted – and the continuity of basic humanitarian aid without precondition is a moral necessity. But the EU should also impose travel bans on Ethiopian officials implicated in human rightsviolations.
We live in an age of global expectations. Our hopes have converged in many ways, none more so than in our democratic aspirations. The moral imperative is for Europe to align with the reform movement in Ethiopia. It is time to stand up for democracy.



Yaamicha Walga’ii Dubartoota Oromo Maraaf

idoa iowo

Yaamicha Walga’ii Dubartoota Oromo Maraaf
Ijaarsa Dubartoota Oromo Addunyaa (IDOA) irra
Ijaarsi Dubartoota Oromoo Addunyaa (IDOA)Walgahii Dubartoota Oromo Fulbana 15, 2013 godhata.
Dubartoonni fi shamaran Oromo umriin (daaddaan) keesan waggaa 18 fi ol taatan, DC, MD fi VA jirattan Walgahii kana irratti akka argamtanii kabajaan isin afeerra.
Teesson: Mana Hawassa Oromo Washington D.C.
6212 3rd Street NW
Washington DC, 20011       
Yeeroon : waarree booda sa’a 2:00 (pm) irraa jalqabee

IDOA