Sunday, October 13, 2013

Oromo Refugees Use Veil for Protection, Disguise

By Peri M. Klemm
Women-in-Eastleigh-KenyaThe adoption of the veil among this group in Kenya’s refugee communities is a new thing, says Peri M. Klemm in this excerpt from “Veiling in Africa.” While there are many reasons for this push, Islam isn’t a motivation for covering up.
October 13, 2013 (WOMENSENEWS)– The adoption of the veil among Oromo refugees living in Eastleigh, Kenya, one the largest urban refugee communities in Africa, is a recent phenomenon.
Women feel increasing pressure to cover their heads and bodies in accordance with the practices of their Somali neighbors and fellow refugees. More and more, as instability and violence escalate, Oromo women are choosing to adopt full hair, head and body covering as a kind of urban camouflage with which to conceal their ethnicity. As one female resident acknowledged, “We grew up free but here we have to cover our faces.”
Yet, just five years ago, Oromo women in Eastleigh proudly wore their cultural dress in public. For refugees with little in the way of material heritage, women’s dress, hairstyles and jewelry have served not only as a vital marker of Oromo identity in their home country of Ethiopia but also as a fundamental assertion of Oromo nationalism in the diaspora.
In the West, the emblematic removal of the veil by Muslim women is a testament to a woman’s sense of empowerment and liberation. For Oromo women, I argue the opposite is true, as only through veiling do women feel free and secure. And while the phenomenon of veiling by Muslim women as a public display of modesty has become a metaphor in Western popular media for female subordination and gender asymmetry, especially post–Sept. 11, 2001, the Oromo example is one in which women veil to protect themselves from harassment, rape and imprisonment. That they feel so threatened is hardly a recommendation for veiling.
Yet whether it is viewed as empowering or repressive by the women themselves, they speak of this choice as a strategy. While women, as reflected in their decorated bodies, have always been viewed as those who create, reproduce and transmit traditional Oromo consciousness (Oromumaa), the wearing of abaya (a long, full dress), hijab (hair, neck, and torso cover) and niqab (facial veil) is a recent and temporary tactic by refugee women to outwardly guard their ethnic affiliation.

Varied Motivations

Dress has become a central, visual strategy within the Muslim refugee community in Eastleigh, where tensions between moderate Muslims and extremists have escalated since 2004. Women’s veiling is a recent condition that communicates the social, political and economic climate of Eastleigh today. It is therefore a newsworthy topic of discussion among friends, family and neighbors, who often note how a woman dresses in public.
Muslim Oromo women and men readily provided the following seven reasons for the increased use of the hijab and niqab by women during my fieldwork.
  • Reason 1: To go to nightclubs and other non-Muslim spaces undetected, removing the hijab and abaya once inside to reveal a miniskirt or jeans. This explanation was most popular among unmarried women under 25 years of age. These young women have very little opportunity to meet publicly, hear new popular music, dance and enjoy the company of members of the opposite sex in other contexts.
  • Reason 2: To appear in public like rich Somali women. One husband stated, “Somali refugees eat meat every day, drink tea with milk in it every day and their women dress smartly. Oromo women see the way they dress, the ornaments they wear and ask their husbands, ‘why not them?’ Husbands feel they can’t compete and lose pride.” In this sense, Somali dress reflects women’s economic goals. Women did not necessarily view hijab and abaya as a symbol of piety or its owner as any more religious than other women in their community. Instead, the abaya and hijab represented the luxurious, transnational fashions from countries like Saudi Arabia and Oman and gave the wearer a worldly, modern air.
  • Reason 3: To appear to be the recipient of support from family and friends in Western countries and thus be subject to less harassment than those who don’t have a connection to outside assistance. Women perceived as Somali, for example, felt they would be less targeted by thieves, as their dress indicates that they have access to wealth and a larger community of support. In other words, Somali men might be more likely to step in and assist a woman who is publicly assaulted on the street or when gathering water or wood away from the camps.

Seeming Religious Affiliations

  • Reason 4: To garner support from the more militant mosques which provide alms for the poor and free or inexpensive education for children.
  • Reason 5: To appear to embrace a nascent religious fanaticism, especially at times of crisis. This was viewed as a good and a bad thing by different individuals, but all agreed that moderate Muslims such as Shaykh Mohammed Rashad and Shaykh Bakri Saphalo, who advocated for a religious foundation in Oromo heritage, are today publicly denounced by radical Muslim sects in a campaign against moderate Islam. Women want to disassociate from the more moderate movements.
  • Reason 6: To dress fashionably and to be modern in accordance with their Islamic belief. When I surveyed Somali and Oromo acquaintances on Facebook in August 2011 who either had lived in Eastleigh or had relatives there, most responded that it is the Islamic way of life to dress modern in abaya and hijab.
  • And reason 7: To provide protection from Ethiopian agents. Government officials are thought to disguise themselves as civilians and kill or kidnap refugees who are viewed as anti-Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front and as Oromo Liberation Front supporters. Some Oromo feel that infiltrators are in Eastleigh in order to play one group of Oromo against another, to gather information for the government and to repress Oromo Liberation Front sympathizers and their family members.
The fact that Oromo informants did not mention Islam as the reason for their choice to veil suggests that this fundamental garment equated with Islamic conviction in the non-Muslim world needs further consideration within the African context. The veil is a powerful symbol of disguise that allows Oromo women to blend in, become Somali, appear wealthy and escape persecution. In this sense, veiling is a potent means of survival at this moment.
This essay is excerpted from  edited by Elisha P. Renne. Available from Indiana University Press. Copyright 2013.

Can a Democracy Trickle down in Africa?

Yaadasaa Dafa | October 12, 2013
yaadasa_dafaa
Yaadasaa Dafa
Can a Democracy trickle down the pipe line of the African states’ governmental apparatus when the dictators of African nations declare to follow the Democratic governing system?  I wish it could be that simple, but practical experiences after experiences had proved to the contrary.  This could be fundamentally due to their undemocratic nature and means they contrived and captured their respective country’s central governments. Once they succeed to overthrow the previous regimes with power of the gun, they often declare to be a better, and the only democratically oriented governing system, as opposed to the previous regimes. But in reality, it will be the beginning of yet another subjugation and government corruption system for the people of that nation under the tribal self proclaimed supremacy, or hegemony of the dictator’s tribe who happen to climb unto the power of the country. It is true that when they just appear on power, such dictators will swear in all the preludes of the Democracy so as to gain the internal as well as the international agencies support for their governments.
When changes of government occurs in majority of the African Nations, people often witness and conclude that the era of wrong imprisonment, mistreatment, and violation of basic human rights is over for that African nation. But as soon as it appears to these dictators that they have consolidated their power in running the country, they suddenly suffer memory loss or sever amnesia of their previous promises/claims to their people, but to the contrary, strengthen their spies and secret services agents, polish their power abusing techniques so as to manipulate and circumvent the established law and order of their developing nations, including all the Democratic principles known to other Democratic Nations of the world. Sooner, these dictators prove to the whole peace loving Nations of the World  that the Democratic principle they are proclaiming is just a trade mark, and what a marvelous conundrum and means of justifying their regime’s corruptions and abuses of power can the pseudo claims of Democracy serve, and be enjoyed at the expenses of the majority of their respective Nation’s!!!! To this end we do have abundant practical examples of regimes of Africa nations robbing their own people in the day light, while swearing to be following principles of Democracy!!!!!
The moral and material International support obtained during the length of stay of such regimes on the power, often obtained under the presumptions of undertaking legal and institutional reform are frequently sent to the banks in the most safer foreign lands such as Switzerland, or utilized purposefully  to consolidate their power by dismantling the established state apparatus and replacing it by their own sectarian/tribal  controlled institutions. More rapidly,  there will be no public institution — the military, judiciary, civil service and regulatory agencies — outside the control of these dictators and their surrogates. Military assistance is one of the plan regularly targeted to be among the major programs sponsored by the Foreign powers to be misused for their own inhumane agendas. Judicial independence will be something alien to them.  The appointment, training, promotion, transfer, and tenure of the civil servants are subject to heavy-handed manipulation by these regimes to subvert the legal system of their countries to serve the political and economic interests of those in power. There will be no safeguard against arbitrary decisions by such government officials. In effect, the regime will have the absolute power to pass any legislation, to enforce or ignore any of the procedural status. In other words, such dictators will appoint themselves to be the kings of that Nation for life. As we have seen and heard on the news, in many African countries, the dictators do control their Nation’s electoral boards so that no other citizen will have the chance even to challenge them, let alone winning the election and forming another administrations. The World have witnessed what had taken place just within this half of a century in African Nations such as Zimbabwe, Ethiopia, Kenya, and the list goes on. In the case of Ethiopia, the following dealings are the daily living facts for the hard working proud Ethiopian people.
Short Review of the relationship between OPDO and its creators/founders:
…..” The President of the Oromia Regional State by then, Abadula Gemeda (real name: Menase Wolde Giorgis), has accepted to hand a villa back to the State in response to an appeal by Prime Minister Meles Zenawi.   The former minister Junedin Sado yielded a plot of land he owned but did not use.   Other officials in the EPRDF (governing coalition) and the TPLF (the regime’s hard core), however, have declined to follow the example, stating that they had paid with blood for all they own today.  Executives in the ANDM such as Addisu Legese (the owner of the Papyrus Hotel in Bahar Dar), Bereket Simon (road haulage) and Tefera Walwa (refuse collection) preferred to remain silent on the matter. Meanwhile, Abadula Gemeda has attributed land to President Girma Woldegiorgis at Alem Gena, near Addis Ababa, where the expropriated peasants are complaining that they have not been paid any compensation.   Source: The Indian Ocean Newsletter, The book and the corruption January 29th, 2009 Right after a book, published by insider, exposes corruption scandals, Aba Dula Gemeda (real name: Menase Wolde Giorgis), president of the Oromia regional state has donated his villa to the Oromo People’s Democratic Organization (OPDO). OPDO is one of TPLF affiliates created by Meles Zenawi mainly from the captives or POWs of the Derg army during the war aiming at controlling and subjugate the Oromo’s.
According to a book by an insider journalist and a writer close to the ruling party, Tesfaye Gebreab, Aba Dula Gemeda was unable to disclose his income source, to OPDO executives, of building a villa that worth 700,000 ET. Birr. “The issue was brought to the late Meles Zenawi” The book reads, “We can’t touch Aba Dula as we don’t have any loyal person [from OPDO] to replace him. ” Zenawi responded.   The puppet president of the Oromia Region, Aba Dula Gemeda, who faced another challenge, had donated his villa to OPDO sometimes ago, according to the weekly reporter, Amharic news paper. The news paper also commented on Mr. Junedin Saddo, by then, a senior OPDO member and minister of science and technology who donated his embezzled plot of land in Adama to his party. “Junedin didn’t say anything about his 3 million Birr worth villa at Letafo.”   The paper said, OPDO is accumulating wealth embezzled from the poor by its leaders.   Several sources are unfolding that the looting and suffering of citizens has continues in the last two decades and half of TPLF’s rule.   Government’s anti-corruption efforts are meant to destroy political foes than the loyal corrupts like Aba dula Gemeda. To that end an anti-corruption commission has been formed in Ethiopia since 2001. By then former prime minister, Tamerat Layne and defense minister, Seye Abraha were victim of dubious corruption charges who served 12 and 6 years respectively in prison.
According to Transparency International, Ethiopia is still classified as one of the most corrupt states in the world, as close circle of people in power are looting the nation. The anti-corruption commission itself has proved to be the most corrupt organ of TPLF’s regime. It is very difficult to abandon corruption so long as Meles Zenawi himself is benefiting from it. A recent report indicates that the late Meles Zenawi’s wife, Azeb Mesfin has rented her modern building to state owned telecommunication for 60 million birr.   News obtained from Indian Ocean Newsletter exposes the late Meles Zenawi’s top men are accumulating wealth at the expense of the majority poor. TPLF top people, including Azeb Mesfin, are owning and running dozens of multi-billion companies. All reporters link the systemic and structural nature of corruption with ethno-centric minority rule. One cannot reasonably expect to root out corruption by a one-party, one-man dictatorship setting up a fake anti-corruption commission. It is simply meant to paying lip-service to the cause of good governance to deceive donor countries.   To end up corruptions and sufferings of the Ethiopian nation, people must join hand and fight the root cause of these miseries which is the TPLF regime. Two decades and half in power, but the people in “Ethiopia” have transited from bad to worst in enduring government imposed miseries.  It is true that “TPLF cannot be reformed; same as the apartheid, it should be abolished.”
Conclusion
It is true that change often scares people. As we all know, change could be fruitful, achievable, and a goal to aim for purposefully. But change is also one of the human observable facts that is misused and habitually abused standard for African Nation’s governance.  As we have witnessed practically over and over again in different parts of the African nations’ experiences, the coup de’etas in the government will entitle the dictator and his surrogates to rule and exploit that African Nation for centuries by appointing each-other to the highest post of the country: Case in point; the present shenanigan of Prime Minister ship in Ethiopia. Furthermore, the inferences of the Ethiopian kings makers the Ethiopian Orthodox Churches present also another scenario of democracy being on the slippery slope in Ethiopia. Therefore, we cannot assure ourselves, let alone the readers, that Democracy can trickle down the pipe line of the African states’ governmental apparatus when the dictators of the Africa Nations often declare to follow the pseudo/fake Democratic governing system!!!! It could be an excellent trade mark for soliciting donations from others, but the citizens do know the true reality.
Yaadasaa Dafa

Africa: More Harsh Words for the Hague At African Union Meeting

The head of the 54-member African Union has said Kenya cannot afford distractions from The Hague. AU leaders are meeting in Ethiopia to discuss the perceived neocolonial biases of the International Criminal Court.
Disillusionment has grown within Africa over the International Criminal Court (ICC). At a two-day extraordinary session of the AU, leaders of several nations accused The Hague of singling out Africans, and demanded that the ICC - the world's first permanent court to try genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity - drop proceedings against Kenya's leadership.
"The security situation in Kenya remains fragile," said Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, the chairwoman of the AU Commission, referring to a recent terrorist attack at a Nairobi shopping mall. "We should therefore not allow Kenya to slide back for any reason ... This requires the undivided attention of its leadership."
African countries account for 34 of the 122 parties to the Rome Statute, the ICC's founding treaty, which took effect on July 1, 2002. A mass pull-out from the court, which some countries have demanded, could seriously damage the institution.
'The entire Africa'
The ICC charged Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta and Deputy President William Ruto with crimes against humanity after postelection violence in late 2007 and early 2008 led to the deaths of more than 1,000 people and the displacement of 600,000. Ruto's trial opened in The Hague on September 10, and Uhuru's trial is set to commence on November 12.
The leaders called for a postponement, arguing that their country takes precedence, especially in the wake of a terrorist attack on a shopping mall in the capital, Nairobi that left at least 67 dead. It would appear that many in Africa agree.
"This is not just about Kenya, but definitely about the entire Africa," said Ethiopian Prime Minister and AU Chairman Hailemariam Desalegn. "Our goal is not and should not be a crusade against ICC but a solemn call for the organization to take Africa's concerns seriously," he added. "It is very unfortunate that the court has continued to operate in complete disregard of the concerns that we have expressed."
Not unanimous
The ICC has issued indictments over conflicts in nine countries, all in Africa. AU diplomats say that the court - an independent body and not part of the United Nations system - has turned a blind eye to other parts of the world. The ICC has convicted only one man: an African warlord.
Some, however, see the benefit of an independent international body. Former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, from Ghana, said a pull-out would give Africa a "badge of shame."
In an opinion article, anti-apartheid icon and Nobel peace laureate Desmond Tutu compared ICC opponents to Nazis seeking to evade justice. He also argued that the number of African cases before the court merely reflects on the dismal record of many of the continent's governments.
AU officials have said they would suggest a permanent consultative body to work with the UN Security Council on concerns regarding the ICC.