Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Diddaan Qeerroo Godina Wallagaa Aaanaa Anfilloo Itti Fufuu Irraan Mootummaan Wayyaanee Jeeqame

Adoolessa 30,2013 Anfilloo

OromiaALutaContinua2011FDGAkkuma beekamu baatii hedduu kan hin turre mootummaan wayyaanee qabeenyaa uummata oromoo saamee fi saamsisuu irra darbee naannolee adda addaatti qabeenyaa saba oromoo qofa mancaasisee uummata harka-qallina jireenyaa fi hiyyummaaf saaxilaa jiraachuun isaa kan beekame tahee,yeroo dhiyoo asitti jiraattota qonnaan bulaa godina Qellem aanaa Anfilloo jedhamu irra jiraatan ajajamuu diduu irraan,qabiyyee uummataa qabeenyaa isaatti jijjiirrachuun yakka sababa hin taaneen uummata oromoo mana hidhaatti guuraa akka ture,qabeenyaa uummmata oromoo addatti qabeenyaa Bunaa jireenya uummata naannoo kanaaf hirkoo kan tahe bor qarshii miliyoona baasuu danda’u uummata kana waan godhu dhabuu irraan qabeenyaa Bunaa ciree balleessaa tureera,kunis doorsisa bittaa isaa tahullee uummata kana mana hidhaatti guuraa jirtu.
Haalli kun amma illee daran hammaachaa deemuu irraan ummatis diddaa isaa itti fufee jira.
Haala kanaan Qeerroon aanaa Qeellam Adoolessa 29-30,2013 barruulee warraaqsaa mormii sirna Wayyaanee fi gochaalee farraa mootummichaa kan muldhisu maxxansaa fi alaabaa ABO bakkoota adda addaatti fannisaa  jiru. Haalli kunis heddumminaan manneen barnootaa fi waajiraalee hojii mootummaa irratti waan baayyateef jecha mootummaan wayyaanee rifaatuu guddaa keessa galee jiraachuu qeerroon gabaasa.
Waraqaa maxxansuu ilaalchisee. Kun yeroodhaa yerootti maxxanfamaa ture jira. Waraqaa maxxansuu irratti baayinan tahullee hanga tokko yeroo darbe hidhamuu namootaa irratti magaalaa Muggii keessatti waraqaa dhaadannoowwan :
ü Hidhamuun Keenya Garbummaatti Nun Hambisu!
ü Wayyaaneef Hin Jilbeenfannu!
ü Amantaan Garagara Tahuun Keenya Tokkummaa Keenya!
ü Oromiyaan Ni Bilisoomti!
ü WBOn Ni Injifata!
Kan jedhu waajjiralee magaalaa fi manneen barnootaa jalatti maxxanfamee jiraachuun gabaafame.

Siidaa Yaadannoo - Calanqoo Calii fi Sheek Bakrii Saphaloo (Oromo-Oromia)

Siidaa Yaadannoo: Calanqoo Calii fi Sheek Bakrii Saphaloo (Video: TV-O)

The Story of a Mandela behind Mandela

Kadiro Elemo | July 31, 2013
This is the story of two Mandelas. Yes, there are two Mandelas. The first one is a Mandela of South Africa, who campaigned against the apartheid. The second one is an Oromo Mandela, who educated the anti-apartheid Mandela. The first Mandela is an international celebrity. He deserves it because he earned it. The other Mandela is an international obscurity, like his otherwise vast people, who are speaking for themselves and coming out from a shadow, a shadow imposed on them by the empire, racism and ignorance of international relations. The South African Mandela is a ferocious enemy of the apartheid who wanted nothing less than the demise of the system. The Oromo Mandela wanted nothing more than amelioration of the system he faithfully served. The white South Africans tolerated Mandela who destroyed their rule. The Ethiopians killed the Oromo Mandela. What a contrast! The apartheid system obviously had more clemency for its black subjects than the Ethiopian system for its Oromo people. Had the Oromo Mandela had a chance to witness history in 1994, he would have said that I am the one who gave the ABCs of soldiering to Nelson Mandela.
Recently, I read a fascinating piece, “The Story of Nelson Mandela’s Missing Pistol” which was written by my dear friend and former classmate at Addis Ababa University, Awol Allo.  As Awol depicted brilliantly, movingly and beautifully, Nelson Mandela, who is widely and popularly known by his tribal name Madiba in South Africa, is an extraordinary man, a man full of courage, wisdom, vision, determination, and who wholeheartedly gave himself for the struggle and freedom of his people.  He is a great man of humanity, and humility, and a trademark of spirit of forgiveness, love and peace. In short, he is an icon of the black race and an epitome of “the best of humanity.” The purpose of my essay is twofold. Firstly, my friend has wonderfully portrayed Mandela the man and the political figure, and his status in the New South Africa. In this essay, thus, I want to shade light on the role of Colonel Taddasa Birru, albeit remote, in the anti-apartheid struggle. Secondly, Awol has brought into the spotlight how the apartheid system and Ethiopian rulers employed the very concept of law and justice to advance, conceal, and humanize their unjust and authoritarian brutality. By comparing the two justice systems, he concludes “that the scale of justice in Apartheid courts is more evenly tipped than their Ethiopian counterparts.” To substantiate his assertion, I will focus on the trial of Maccaa-Tuulamaa Self-help Association to establish roles of courts in Ethiopia in legitimation and perpetuation of the ruthless dictatorship. I should advise my readers that some of the stories in this essay are already discussed in my book, “Ethiopia and United States; The Tragedy of Human Rights.”
As Awol aptly reflected in this writing, Mandela is adored among his countrymen for instituting an armed wing of the African National Congress (MK). He resorted to a military solution when all peaceful venues were closed on the struggle of the Africans for equality. The guerrilla resistance, coupled with international sanctions, ultimately compelled Apartheid South Africa to step back from leaping forward with its affront to humanity and seek compromise with the ANC.
It was this mission of fighting the Apartheid regime that took Mandela to Kolfe, a suburb of Finfinne, in early 1960s. Mandela, an amateurish boxer, armed with nothing but bravery, a resolution, and a sparkling hope, desired to learn the art of war-making to advance the cause of his downtrodden people. This created an opportunity for the two future historic figures to meet, Mandela and Colonel Taddasa Birru.
In his memoir, “Long Walk to Freedom,” Mandela noted, “I was lectured on military science by Colonel Tadesse, who was also assistant commissioner of police.” The colonel taught him about ‘how to create a guerrilla force, how to command an army, and how to enforce discipline’. Mandela, a man who changed the world through his passion and compassion, indicated that the colonel opened his eyes to the military science and shaped his worldview. He lectured him egalitarian ethos of a liberation army, which made the MK popular among its ranks and files. This is how Mandela recalls a conversation with the colonel:
One evening, during supper, Colonel Tadesse said to me, ‘now Mandela you are creating a liberation army, not a conventional capitalist army. A liberation army is an egalitarian army. You must treat your men entirely differently than you would in a capitalist army. When you are on duty, you must exercise your authority with assurance and control. This is no different from a capitalist command. But when you are off duty, you must conduct yourself on the basis of perfect equality, even with the lowliest soldier. You must eat what they eat; you must not take your food in your office, but eat with them, drink with them, not isolate yourself’.
Mandela training in Kolfe was supposed to last for six months, but after two-months, he decided to go back to South Africa as the struggle was bearing fruit and a commander was needed on the ground. Mandela speaks,
Colonel Tadesse rapidly arranged for me to take an Ethiopian flight to Khartoum. Before I left, he presented me with a gift: an automatic pistol and two hundred rounds of ammunition. I was grateful, both for the gun and his instruction.
It was this very gun that Mandela had buried before he was sent to a prison cell on the Robben Island. The fall of the symbolic gun, in the hand of the Apartheid, would have been a psychological disaster, sort of propaganda coup for the apartheid. It is the story of this enigmatic gun that caught the attention of my friend, who was otherwise, went to see a site of the Rivonia Trial in Liliesleaf, SA. Awol has briefly walked us through the place, which transformed from the center of “sabotage and terrorism” to the center of “liberation.” He superbly elucidated the emotional, historic, and symbolic significance of the gun. The military science and the gun for Mandela were contributions of the Oromo hero in a fight against the Apartheid.
It was December 1960 that American educated Girmame Naway and his brother Mangistu Naway, commander of the Imperial Bodyguard decided to relieve Ethiopia from the rule of Emperor Hayla Sillase. At the time, the emperor was on the official tour in Brazil. They convinced a police commissioner, Warqinah Gabayyahu, to join the plot. As it was a Manzyan matter, they did not consult a man who would be a game changer, Colonel Taddasa, decorated anti-fascist hero and deputy commander of police. The news of the coup was a surreal moment,  a nerve-racking and  an earthquake for the Colonel since he was indoctrinated that even speaking bad of the divine emperor was transgressing the Law of God that would lead to the fall of Sky. He lost his cool for the “sacred” office of “the God Elect” was disputed and violated. He prepared the Ethiopian Police Riot Battalion for the Kamikaze type mission. He gathered his fellow brainwashed policemen. They passionately chanted and chanted, ‘Let us sacrifice ourselves for our beloved emperor!’ “Let us Perish for Ethiopia.”He marched his men, along the national army, to restore the glory of King Solomon, the son of David, the Son of God, and, above all, to restore the Glory of God. Dying in the mission was dying for the cause of God, and the reward was The Eternal Zion.
The human wave overwhelmed the putschists, who intrepidly fought back, including massacring their hostages. Thousands died, and the coup failed. Mandela knew the Colonel’s role in aborting the coup, “Colonel Tadesse….had been instrumental in foiling a recent coup against the emperor.”
Therefore, at the time of Mandela arrival in Kolfe, Mandela and the Colonel were two totally different figures. Mandela was a man ready to stop the oppression, exploitation, and segregation of his people. Contrarily, the Colonel was a man who saved the throne that exploited and humiliated his people at its nadir.
In 1963, the farsighted minds of the Oromo, who tired of imperial obstructionism, and who were tired of self-mortifications created a Maccaa-Tuulamaa Self-help Association to kindle development and education of their people.  The association was formed by those Oromos who fully assimilated to achieve the Abyssinian dream, but failed because of the government incapacitating system. It was this association that approached Colonel Taddasa to join it as an inspirational figure for his people. Because of his fierce Amhara nationalism, the colonel was reluctant to join the education of his native people even in a language of the ruling class. At the time, he was also the chairman of the national literacy campaign. Eventually, he changed his heart after a number of appeals from Oromo elders.
Wanting to keep the Oromo masses uneducated forever, the empire did not like the Colonel involvement to enhance the condition of his people. Prime Minister Aklilu Habtawald invited him for candid discussion. Assuming that the indistinguishable General was his fellow Amhara personage, he earnestly advised him that ‘educating the Oromos, in Amharic, is an ocean whose wave could flood them’.
What the Colonel heard was a rude awakening. This turned his worldview upside down, for the nation he loved so much, never loved him back, and for the throne he almost vanished for wanted to keep his people under literacy embargo.  It changed him forever. It changed him from the Ethiopian patriot into the father of modern Oromo nationalism. He shaded his Amara mask, a transition from pseudo persona to real self, from self-despise to self-respect, from subservience to assertiveness, and from accepting second class status to yearning for equality and freedom. Although I do not know the extent of Mandela influence on the Colonel, I surmise that he desired to be a Mandela of his people, an Oromo Mandela who built especial place in the minds and hearts of the Oromo people, a Mandela that the world unrecognized.
For choosing to educate his people, the empire dealt a coup de grace to his colorful military career. He was fired. The decision embittered him. He was more committed than ever to become the mouthpiece of his unhappy people. Thus, the Maccaa-Tuulamaa Self-help Association became a popular movement and a semblance of a political party in the party-less imperial system, where there is only one candidate and one voter: Hayla Sillasse, The Elect of God.
As law abiding and peace-loving citizens, the Oromos respected even the repressive law of the empire. The empire did not like the association. It was associated with fomenting tribal tension and, it accused them of hurting a national sentiment of the country by using a forbidden language, Afaan Oromoo, for its meetings. At the time, it was illegal and un-Ethiopian to teach, write, preach, or broadcast in any Oromo dialect throughout the realm of Ethiopia. The association banned.
As I mentioned earlier, Awol highlights the agency of the law in the execution of unjust and inhumane repression, all in the name of justice. When he draws the parallel between the courts under the apartheid system and the EPRDF Ethiopia, his finding appalls him. Courts workings under the apartheid system were benign in their instrumentality in rationalizing irrationalities of human wrongs compared to those under the current Ethiopian government. He amply made clear that the court houses were the only place for rationality to prevail under the apartheid system unlike the case in Ethiopia. I will corroborate the same argument by focusing on the trial of Maccaa-Tuulamaa Self-help Association in my next essay.

Kadiro Elemo is a Chicago based independent researcher and the author of “The United States and Ethiopia: The Tragedy of Human Rights.”

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Ethiopian athletes to attempt distance doubles in Moscow

By Vereso Mwanga
Dibaba won gold in both events at the 2005 World Championships and the 2008 Olympic Games (FILE)
Two of Ethiopia’s renown athletes will attempt a long-distance double at the World athletics Championships to be held in Moscow Russia between the 10th -18th of  August.
Three-time Olympic gold medalist Tirunesh Dibaba and double Olympic champion Meseret Defar have both been selected in the 5000m and 10,000m.
Dibaba won gold in both events at the 2005 World Championships and the 2008 Olympic Games.
Defar has attempted distance doubles at the past two World Championships, winning the 5000m bronze on both occasions.
Meanwhile, six of Russia’s nine reigning World champions will defend their titles. In total, 119 athletes, 50 men and 69 women will compete for the hosts.
They include Yuliya Zaripova in the 3000m Steeplechase and Mariya Savinova in the 800m.
Elsewhere, nine reigning World champions and 20 individual Olympic medalists from London will lead the US team at the world event.
Athletes seeking to defend their 2011 World titles include 110m hurdler Jason Richardson, 100m sprinter Carmelita Jeter and 1500m runner Jenny Simpson.
>kbc

Somalia Polio Outbreak Places Ethiopia at Risk

In this May 28, 2013 photo, vaccination workers give an anti-polio drop to a child in Mogadishu, Somalia.
In this May 28, 2013 photo, vaccination workers give an anti-polio drop to a child in Mogadishu, Somalia.
TEXT SIZE 
Gabe Joselow

Response to Bewketu Seyoum’s Article

By Tesfaye Kebede*
Not sure what to make out of this gibberish (read here: http://borumeda.blogspot.com/2013/07/normal-0-false-false-false-en-us-x-none.html) from a certain Bewketu Seyoum writing about the ongoing Oromo and Southern cultural revolution; each of his sentence is constructed to deliberately use the rarest Amharic word/phrase possible (even those words used only during ESLCE Amharic exams) – all the energy is wasted to make the sentences flowery, but their meanings remain meaningless. Ya-Qaalaat Daadaataa only. His conclusion is that the ongoing cultural revolution is a sign of backward and stagnant mentality. Not sure why he wasted all these words and phrases, instead of just saying that in point-blank.
Responses Point-by-Point:
1) He refutes the thesis that the Ethiopian state was formed as a result of conflicts among three mainactors: the Oromo, the Amhara and the Tigreans. His thesis is that the Ethiopian state is not a result of conflicts, but of cooperation. By doing this, he negates the major pillar of the Ethiopianist’s argument (his camp’s major pillar) that no country has ever been created without violence. His Ethiopianist colleagues say this to rationalize the genocide perpetrated on the Oromo and the South by Menelik as a virtue whose end, but not means, was justified. Why did Bewketu view the genocide unleashed by Menelik’s Abyssinian/Amhara army on the Oromo and the South as “a peaceful cooperation among the South, the Oromo and Menelik/Amhara to create the Ethiopian state”? There were no signs of cooperation, but conflicts.
He simply cites the support Yohannes IV received from the Rayya/Wollo Oromo and the Afar against the Khedivate of Egypt as an example, but he deliberately misinterprets this coalition among neighbors with equal sovereigns (i.e. the Tigray-led Abyssinian state, the Rayya/Wollo Oromo state and the Afar Sultanate) as if it had been done under one sovereign kingdom, the Abyssinian state. Is it not true that the Afar Sultanate exists even today (with limited power due to the Abyssinian state’s takeover of the Afar sovereignty)? And, what about the Rayya/Wollo Oromo sovereignty? Wasn’t it Yohannes IV who crushed the Rayya/Wollo Oromo sovereignty and placed it under the Abyssinian state domination – guess at which place? … Boru-Meda! – the very name of Bewketu’s blog. Isn’t this what having affection for words/phrases without knowing their true meaning do to you? In addition to taking over the sovereignty of the Rayya/Wollo Oromo state, Yohannes IV also forced Wollo Oromo leaders (Imam Mohammed Ali and Imam Amade Liben) to be converted to Christianity with names, Ras Mikael (with his Godfather being Yohannes IV), and Ras Hayla-Maryam (with his Godfather being Menelik), respectively. There were no signs of cooperation, but conflicts.
2) A note to squash his “word borrowing as integration” – thesis. It’s said that some 30% of the English words are from the French language originally. However, neither the English/British nor the French claim that they have created an “integrated nation” out of this borrowing of words/phrases between the two languages. Citing that some Afan Oromo words (however many they may be) have been borrowed into Amharic, and to conclude that an “integrated Ethiopian nation” of the Oromo and the Amhara has been created is a wrong conclusion. The Ethiopian nation, if it even exists, is still the replica of the Amhara/Habesha culture, language and Orthodox worldview. By the way, Amharic has borrowed words from Arabic also – is Bewketu going to claim that the “Ethiopian national identity” also represents the Arabs? Keldun Tewew.
3) On the Oromo worldview: Bewketu fails to really see the essence of the Oromo Ateete while calling it“Zar” and “Wukabi” – understanding the Oromo worldview as an Amhara is not easy. Ateete is neither“Zar” nor “Wukabi,” but those with no understanding of the Oromo worldview are prone to misinterpret it. Saying the Oromo gave the culture of “Zar” and “Wukabi” to the Amhara is rather insulting the Oromo culture and worldview. There are many scholarly articles available online on Ateete to learn about it from the Oromo itself, instead of referring to a racist and bigoted view of Ateete from Debtera Desta Teklewold.
4) Bewketu on Oromo land: he says, “ኦሮሞ በረጅም ዘመን፣ በሠፊ ምድር፣ ሰፍሮ የመኖሩን ያክል” – here, the keyword is“ሰፍሮ” – this is another Oromo-phobic view of the Ethiopianist camp. They still have to acknowledge the Oromo-land (Biyyaa Oromoo) as the Oromo people’s country. To conveniently throw the poisonous word, “ሰፍሮ,” is only done to alienate the Oromo people from their land. ESAT also uses this term to support their thesis that the “Oromo invaded Ethiopia from the Indian Ocean, Madagascar, … and so on.”
Gadaa.com
5) Bewketu’s view on the ongoing cultural revolution in Oromia and the South. Yesterday, the fashion of the day among the Habesha elites was to insult the Oromo and the South as “culture”-less, “history”-less and “language”-less peoples. Today, he’s criticizing the Oromo and Southern peoples for embracing their identities by reviving their lost cultures, histories and languages. To show his phobia for this cultural revolution, he insults themiskin Gabi saying “Gabi can’t be pride.” … Gabi melbesem endezi anadotal ende! Gud bel, Borena.
6) Bewketu’s remark from Ato Afework Gebreyesus is encouraging only if he can discern its true meaning: – “A generation that cannot be better than its predecessors should be considered unborn.” That’s why this generation of the Oromo, the QubeeGeneration, is upholding the Oromo identity and cultural heritage much better than its predecessors since the occupation of Oromiyaa. Like the Sankofabird, this generation is reclaiming the past for the future. Oromo’s past was violently deleted from the history books by the successive Abyssinian regimes, it is the task of this generation to reclaim the past and chart the future based on the findings.
7) By his own admission, Bewketu began his article saying the “Ethiopian state” was a result of the cooperation among the major actors, the Oromo, the Amhara and the Tigreans. Here, the keyword is “cooperation.” And, he concludes his article without telling us what will happen to this “Ethiopian state” in a situation where its “founding principle of cooperation” among the major actors no longer exists – as it’s evident today. Instead, he raises his left arm to shout a familiar slogan, “Andinet Weyim Mot” – that’s the summarizing notion of his last paragraph. Bewketu, “Andinet Weyim Mot” yalut, yet deresu?
Tesfaye Kebede can be reached at TesfayeKebedeLives@gmail.com

The Ethiopian Civil Rights Movement: Promising Developments

by Alemu Tafesse
Nur Protest July 2013The Ethiopian Muslims’ movement, an activism that took too many an observer by surprise when it started, is getting even more promising day by day. It has kept amazing some for its unmatched persistence, size, and visibility. It has startled others for forcefully injecting into the otherwise dormant Ethiopian politics an aura of democratic culture and oppositional dynamism despite authoritarian brutality. As I once argued, it has also become perhaps the only massive and persistent location of democracy in current Ethiopia. Needless to say, it has, finally, inaugurated in the country a new era of non-violent anti-dictatorial struggle. Simply put, the civil rights movement has already left an indelible mark in Ethiopia’s present and future politics.
The most recent developments have been conspicuously remarkable, and are demonstrating the starker successes this movement is registering, and also its constructive transformations. The first and most obvious development is that it has generally gotten sturdier over time (despite some fluctuations now and then). However much the government wished it to fade away with the passage of time, the movement has gone increasing in size and the protesters have gone betraying stronger dedication to the cause. Starting from the few weeks leading up to the Holy Month of Ramadan, and right into the third week of the month, the Merkato and Piassa streets of Addis Ababa have aired perhaps the loudest ever public outcry and accommodated the largest ever gatherings.
The government indeed realized/anticipated the amount of opposition building against it, and has taken measures to deflect it.  This time around, it has refined, magnified, and expanded on the murder of a Sheikh in Dessie. The incident has been given phenomenal attention to the extent that the ruling party issued an official statement on it, brought out people condemning it, and endlessly propagandized about it on the state media.  The immediate extraction of multiple cards from the murder alone requires close attention in order to understand the government’s reactions to the growing opposition. But we can even go further to seriously doubt the government’s claim that the Sheikh was killed by “networked terrorists”. It is by now a matter of consensus among the huge Muslim crowd protesting every Friday as well as many other Ethiopians of diverse backgrounds that the murder was a work of the government itself that aimed at stepping up the crackdown on Muslim activists and limiting the expected contagious effects of the movement by mobilizing the “Sufis” against a so-called “wahhabi” threat.  Given a number of factors that deal with the circumstances of the killing and the track record of the ruling party, this is an argument not at all difficult to wholeheartedly accept as valid. But the important point here is the one that deals with the way, and the end to which, the killing was put to use by the government, which we have already seen.
Whether such a strategy succeeds remains to be seen as both the anti-government and government projects are now strongly underway, but it is getting clear that the Muslims movement is now been taken to a whole new level with the introduction of yet advanced forms of protest.
Two are worth-mentioning. The first is graffiti. In a dozen of places in Addis and the regions, walls have been found covered with writings that depict some of the demands of the protesters.  Through these writings, the demands of the Muslim activists are carried on to days other than Friday; are given an alternative visual form of expression; and  are singled out individually and magnified—all  for ensuring deep public re-consideration.
The other—and more– significant development is the internationally held shows of protest and solidarity with the cause. Ethiopian Muslims in the diaspora have been quite active in showing their solidarity with the struggle inside the country. But on the last days of July, the remarkable coordination among activists in different countries over various continents has given the movement a more solid, more organized and truly global face. It has, more than other things, proved to the world the potent organizational capacity of and the strong unity of purpose that resides in, this civil rights movement. It demonstrated not only the great potential of the movement in effectively challenging the EPRDF dictatorship but also the consistent rise in the maturity of the Ethiopian Muslim activism. The protest in Addis Ababa was especially extraordinary. It was simply so huge, so loud and so visible that even the state media was forced not to ignore it, but give it a “meaning” in accordance with its “terror” rhetoric. July 26 is yet another unforgettable day in the history of indefatigable and free expression of anti-EPRDF public fury.
The last, but the politically most important, development is the contribution of this struggle to the revivalism of a serious oppositional politics in the country. This point, I believe, is so significant that the ultimate measurement of the success of this movement is the degree to which it helps bring about serious and sustainable political dynamism that has the potential to eventually create a democratic political environment at the state level. The movement has already played a prominent role in this regard, which I want to touch upon in the following lines.
Two opposition political parties have successfully organized public rallies in different regions of Ethiopia. These rallies have been recorded as the first of their kind since the 2005 elections. While there could be multiple reasons that were behind the decisions on the part of the parties to take such a bold step, the fact that the Muslim movement was of phenomenal significance is absolutely undeniable. The movement might have contributed to the revitalization of the will of the opposition parties to call for protests in three major ways: first, it might have sparked in the minds of party leaders the very imagination of the display of opposition outside the realm of press conference and press release. Such an imagination had been virtually extinguished among many anti-EPRDF politicians after the 2005 debacle. Secondly, for some other politicians, it was not actually imagining public protest that was lacking but the daring will put to use this form of opposition for political purpose. They had been waiting for a precedent that would mitigate the perceived costs of organizing protests. In this regard, the Muslim movement, not because of government leniency, but because of the protesters astounding flexibility and persistence in waging the non-violent struggle, posited this latter option as a feasible, and not necessarily so costly, form of resistance. This was a very important lesson for opposition parties that had once lost vitality having put between a rock and a hard place–forced to choose between submissiveness and armed struggle. A third path, peaceful protest, was gradually getting its admirers in some circles, but the still fresh obnoxious memory of the 2005 incidents couldn’t let the opposition transcend the dilemma it was facing. The Muslim movement paved the way for re-gaining confidence and re-empowering pro-liberation and anti-government spirits.
Thirdly, the Muslim movement boosted the confidence of the parties in yet another way: the immensely disgruntled Muslim population gave an assurance to the parties that if they touch the right cord, an enormous crowd can positively respond to their call for attending rallies. Echoing the demands of the Muslims can be a sufficient reason to get thousands of people on the streets, let alone invoking, in addition, other sources of frustration in the society like the ethnically motivated dislocations, economic downturn and the detention of journalists and politicians. The parties were adept enough to mobilize people based on all of these causes—and, expectedly, with notable success.
Thus, the Muslim struggle not only bred emancipatory sparks of thoughts, but also generated a good deal of will power among opposition circles. It, too, offered dependable promise that such thoughts and will at the level of party leadership would be positively received by significant sections of the population that could also be characterized as disgruntled and audacious. In short, the Ethiopian Muslim civil rights movement gave guidance and also revitalized the rather confused, gloomy, and defeatist oppositional politics in the country.
The new political dynamism that was kicked off to a large extent by the Muslim activism is now gaining momentum. Parties have gotten back their lives and the population has started to vent out its deep and multifarious frustrations. Such a show of people’s power needs to go unabated—actually increasing forcefully—until the core of the state gets disciplined. This is a long way forward, and certainly too many obstacles are ahead of us. But the path to democracy is not cushy, and all who push for it are bound to know this fact very well.
Finally, I would like to pause on one challenge that the Muslim activism has been facing in recent times. Some Ethiopians tended to mistake the movement for some individuals that support it and, based on this false conclusion, dared to question the very motive of it. This, as Maru Zeleke rightly notes[1], is a dangerous move—for Ethiopian politics, above all. It is tantamount to willfully attempting to derail a historic and exemplary struggle against authoritarianism. As a social movement that hinges on religious freedom and secularism, people from diverse walks of life and political thought, but who share some of the basic liberationist principles the Muslim struggle stands on, have supported it. Many of the ardent supporters had been well-known for their political positions well before the emergence of the movement, and they have happened to stand by it without necessarily jettisoning those positions of theirs. While they decided to do so, they knew, as all the Muslim activists back home did, that they had no representational role whatsoever in the movement. The only representatives of this civil rights movement, as has been widely and consistently agreed upon, are its incarcerated leaders and those endorsed by them and by the Muslim activists back home. It is, hence, an egregious mistake to associate their non-political struggle with the political position or line of thought of any supporter in the Diaspora[2].
It is immensely important that we realize the great potential of this struggle, attentively learn from it, and selflessly build on it in order to bring it to an all-satisfactory conclusion for all freedom-wishing Ethiopians. And the first step to do this is to keep our ideological fights far from it while still fully reaping its wide-ranging benefits towards the betterment of our politics. We should shun all unfounded suspicions about it, and let it rise above all political fault lines but still gain the unreserved support of all our political groupings.