Friday, October 11, 2013

Wayyaaneen EPRDF Waraana Isaa Irraa Amantaa Dhabuun Caasaa Haaraa Ijaaraa Jiraachuun Gabaafame.

Mootummaan Wayyaanee waraana isaa irraa amantamummaa dhabeen caasaa waraanaa haaraa hojii dhabdootaa fi dargaggoota Habashaa amanamtoota tahan baajata hedduu ramadee ijaaruuf karoorfatuun isaa saaxilame
Mootummaan EPRDF Wayyaanee keessi isaa erga burkutaa’uu eegalee bubbulee jira. Haalli kun daran jabaachuun waraanaa fi amanamtoota Wayyaanee yeroo dheeraa hammachaa dhufe. Waraana mootummaan wayyaanee ittiin uummata miidhaa ture hammachaa dhufuun mootummaa wayyaanee hedduu yaaddessaa jira.
Mootummaan Wayyaanees kana dura dhaabbachuuf caasaa waraanaa haaraa dhalootaan habashaa tahanii fi dargaggoota Oromoo hojii dhabdummaan rakkatan mallaqaan gowwoomsee ijaaruuf baajata hedduu ramaduun karoorfatee jira. Ilmaan Oromoo waraana mootummaa Wayyaanee keessatti argamtan shira diinaa kana dura aanuuf hojiin hangaftummaan hojjechuun isin barbaachisu jaarmaya keessan jabeeffachuu dha. Qeerroon shira mootummaan wayyaanee wixinu hanga dhumaa dura dhaabbachuuf wareegama kamuu akka kaffalu addeessa.
Ilmaan Oromoo martis shira diinaa waanjoo garbummaa bara baraan fe’uuf Wayyaaneen qopheeffate dura akka dhaabbattan qeerroon waamicha dabarsa.

African Union condemns 'unfair' ICC

Uhuru Kenyatta (back row), at the International Criminal Court in The Hague on 8 April 2011
Uhuru Kenyatta (back row) says his case will interfere with his running of the country


The International Criminal Court is treating Africa unfairly, a senior African Union official has said, at the start of a special AU meeting to discuss a possible pull-out.
Ethiopian Foreign Minister Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said the court was targeting Africa and Africans.
The two-day summit comes as Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta is due to face trial at The Hague next month.
He denies charges of organising violence after the 2007 elections.

“Start Quote

Those leaders seeking to skirt the court are effectively looking for a license to kill, maim and oppress their own people”
Archbishop Desmond Tutu
On Thursday, Mr Kenyatta again asked for the charges to be dismissed.
He, along with some other African leaders, argue that a serving president should not be made to face trial.
The ICC has rejected a previous request that he be allowed to give evidence by video link.
His deputy, William Ruto, faces similar charges, which he also denies.
His trial was postponed for a week last month to allow him to return home to help deal with the terror attack on the Westgate shopping centre.
'Like Hermann Goering'
Mr Tedros, who is the current chairman of the AU's Executive Council, said the ICC was "condescending" towards the continent.
"Far from promoting justice and reconciliation... the court has transformed itself into a political instrument targeting Africa and Africans. This unfair and unjust treatment is totally unacceptable," he said.

ICC in brief

Fatou Bensouda
  • Set up in 2002
  • Based in The Hague, the Netherlands
  • Deals with genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and the crime of aggression
  • Court has been ratified by 121 countries, including 34 in Africa
  • Chief Prosecutor is Fatou Bensouda, a Gambian
  • Democratic Republic of Congo militia leader Thomas Lubanga is the only person to be convicted so far
  • Investigating cases in Uganda, DR Congo, the Central African Republic, Sudan, Kenya, Libya, Mali and Ivory Coast
He said that the ICC had failed to respond to the African Union's previous complaints and said the issue should be referred to the UN Security Council.
Kenya's foreign minister has denied initial reports that it is lobbying for the African Union to call for all member states to withdraw from the ICC.
Analysts say several East African nations favour such a move, while there is less support in West Africa.
Botswana has also publicly supported the court, while South Africa's governing African National Congress has voiced criticism.
Thirty-four of the AU's 54 members have signed up to the ICC.
If a large number of the 34 African countries were to pull out, it would be a huge blow to the ICC, which has 122 members.
Kenya's parliament has already passed a motion for the country to withdraw.
Former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan has said that withdrawing from the court would be a "badge of shame".
Nobel Peace laureate Archbishop Desmond Tutu has also voiced his support for the ICC.
"Those leaders seeking to skirt the court are effectively looking for a license to kill, maim and oppress their own people without consequence. They believe the interests of the people should not stand in the way of their ambitions of wealth and power," he wrote in an article carried by several newspapers.
"They simply vilify the institution as racist and unjust, as Hermann Goering and his fellow Nazi defendants vilified the Nuremberg tribunals following World War II," he wrote.
All eight of the cases currently open at the ICC are in Africa but it is also investigating possible cases elsewhere.

=>bbc

Hojjettootni hidha Abbayyaa gaaffii dabalinsa miindaa gaafataniin deebii hatattamaa waan dhabaniif hojii gadhiisuu irratti argamu.

Gaaffiin dabalinsa miindaa Impaayera Itoophiyaa keessatti jabaachaa dhufuun isaa beekamaa dha. Haalli kunis kan daran jabaate hojjettootni hidha Abbayyaa guutummaan dabalinsa miindaa gaafatanii jiran. Mootummaan Wayyaanee gaaffii isaanii kanaaf deebii hatattamaa laachuu waan dideefis hojjettootni hidha Abbayyaa kunneen hojii gadhiisuu irratti argamu.
Haala kanaan Hanga ammaa hojjettootni 200 ol tahan hojii dhaabuudhaan gadhiisanii jiran. Rakkoon fayyaas hojjettoota hidha kanaa mudachaa kan ture yeroo ammaas daran jabaatee jira. Waardiyootni hidha kanaa poolisoota federaalaa tahanis hojjettoota waliin rakkoon mudachaa jiru akka hiikamu gaafachuun hatattamaan hin hiikamu taanaan hojii dhaabuuf murteessuu isaanii beeksisaniin jiran. Jala deemtotni Wayyaanees gocha kanaan kan dhiphatan yoommuu tahu, hojiin hidha kanaas laamsha’uu irratti argama.

Ethiopia seeks Egypt and Sudan support in key Dam project

October 10, 2013 (ADDIS ABABA) - Ethiopia has called on Sudan and Egypt to support its building of Africa’s largest Hydro power dam project along the Nile River saying the ongoing construction of the Grand Renaissance dam will benefit the three countries.
According to a statement released on Thursday from the office of the Ethiopia prime minister, downstream countries particularly Egypt should support construction of the dam and drop its long-standing objection against the project.
Egypt has been protesting against the dam arguing that the construction will diminish its water share.
The Nile water is a source to 95 % of Egypt’s water demand. Ethiopia’s massive dam project has been a major economic and water security concern to the North African Nation.
When Ethiopia diverted the flow of the Nile water in May as part of the engineering work, tension between Addis Ababa and Cairo escalated.
Sudan has officially backed the project and offered support after a tripartite international experts group which had been tasked to assess the potential impacts announced that the project will not have any significant impact on downstream countries.
Egypt however refused to accept the final findings saying the report was inadequate and sought another study on the likely impact of the dam of its share of the water.
At a news conference this week, Ethiopian prime minister, Hailemariam Desalegn called on Cairo and Khartoum to actively and practically begin to engage in cooperating and providing support for Ethiopia to finish the “regional project”
The premier reiterated that his country will continue to push forward the construction of the dam despite discomfort from downstream countries.
He said the benefits from the hydro dam facility will be shared between the three countries and Sudan and Egypt need to contribute to the construction of the 4.6 billion dollar project which Ethiopia is currently financing it from it own coffers.
Ethiopia says the dam project won’t harm Sudan or Egypt but will benefit them by providing cheap and clean energy, by controlling over flooding, reducing siltation as well as contributing to regional economic integration.
(ST)


Thursday, October 10, 2013

African states must reject calls to withdraw from the ICC

African states must reject calls to withdraw from the International Criminal Court, says Amnesty International.
The African Union (AU) is due to hold an extraordinary summit in Addis Ababa on 11 and 12 October. It is understood that a proposal will be tabled for the en bloc withdrawal of African countries from the Rome Statute of the ICC.
Some AU members are concerned that the ICC is unfairly targeting African countries.
“A resolution calling on African states to withdraw en bloc from the Rome Statute would be reactionary in the extreme,” says Tawanda Hondora, Amnesty International’s Deputy Director of Law and Policy.
“Such a resolution would serve no purpose except to shield from justice, and to give succour to, people suspected of committing some of the worst crimes known to humanity.”
“The ICC should expand its work outside Africa, but it does not mean that its eight current investigations in African countries are without basis. The victims of these crimes deserve justice.”
Most of the cases in Africa were referred to the ICC by the African governments themselves. These include Central African Republic, Cote d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda and Mali. Two other cases, Darfur and Libya, were referred by the UN Security Council with the full support of its African members.
However, a group of African states, among them Kenya, have been leading a campaign against the ICC. The group has escalated its efforts following the election of Uhuru Kenyatta as President and William Ruto as Deputy-President earlier this year. Both have been charged by the ICC with crimes against humanity committed during the post 2007-8 election violence that left 1,000 people dead and displaced more than 600,000.
Kenya’s parliament has already committed to considering its withdrawal. However, such a step cannot stop the current ICC trials. It could, however, lead to impunity if future crimes are committed in the country. Any withdrawal would not take effect for a year.
“An initiative to organize further withdrawals from the ICC through the African Union would send the wrong signal about Africa’s commitment to protect and promote human rights and reject impunity, all of which are values central to the African Union itself,” adds Tawanda Hondora.
Ahead of the Summit, African Union chief Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma has also written to the President of the Security Council urging it to defer the case in Kenya following the attack in Westgate, Nairobi.
“Victims of the post-election violence have waited over five years to see the cogs of justice turn after Kenya failed to deliver justice and the ICC stepped in,” says Tawanda Hondora. “A deferral would delay justice to victims and would likely lead to repeated requests for annual extensions which would reinforce impunity. The ICC’s trials should proceed.”
“African governments played a vital role in setting up the ICC and their commitment has ensured that millions of victims of human rights abuses across Africa and around the world have access to justice. This must not be undermined by a few countries solely interested in protecting their own leaders.”

Ethiopia: millions of Oromo and Somali suffering genocide

by Thomas C. Mountain
Migrants-in-Mediterranean-008October 10, 2013 (For what we are they will be) — Most of the millions of Ethiopians forced into the global limbo of displacement are Oromo or ethnic Somali from the Ogaden, victims of the Ethiopian regime’s genocidal policies. During the recent devastating drought, “all of Oromia and the Ogaden affected by this catastrophe were prevented from receiving food and medical aid by the Ethiopian regime” – one of Washington’s closest allies in Africa.
“At one point up to 1,000 people a day, mostly women, children and the elderly, were dying of hunger.”
Every year for a decade or more a million Ethiopians, 10 million and counting, have left, or fled, their homeland. While the television screens of the world have been flooded with images of North African migrants drowning off the Italian island of Lampedusa, the bones of tens of thousands of Ethiopian refugees lay in unmarked graves along Yemeni shores or at the bottom of the Indian Ocean or Red Sea.
How is it you might ask, that this 10 million human tsunami remains almost unknown to the world? And why, why would ten million Ethiopians, one in every 8 people in the country, risking their lives in many cases, seek refuge in foreign, mostly unwelcoming, lands?
The answer lies in the policies of the Ethiopian regime which have been described by UN investigators in reports long suppressed with words such as “food and medical aid blockades,” “scorched earth counterinsurgency tactics,” “mass murder” and even “genocide.”
Ethiopian Killosh (ethnic states)
Ethiopian Killosh (ethnic states)
Most of the Ethiopians refugees are from the Oromo nationality, at 40 million strong half of Ethiopia, or the ethnic Somalis of the Ogaden. Both of these regions in southern Ethiopia have long been victims of some of the most inhumane, brutal treatment any peoples of the world have ever known (it has been estimated that a full half of all Oromos were wiped out during the western supported Abyssinian Imperialist colonialisation during the late 1800’s by the forefathers of “Emperor” Haile Sellasie).
These past few years saw the worst drought and famine in the Horn of Africa in 60 years yet almost all of Oromia and the Ogaden affected by this catastrophe were prevented from receiving food and medical aid by the Ethiopian regime.
What country in the world is allowed to expel both the Red Cross and Doctors Without Borders during such a humanitarian crisis and not be roundly condemned by the international community? Only Ethiopia.
In Somalia alone the UN has admitted at least 250,000 starved to death during this famine with estimates for the victims in Oromia and the Ogaden running at least this high.
500,000 people starving to death in a couple of years and no outcry from the world? At one point up to 1,000 people a day, mostly women, children and the elderly, were dying of hunger and all we got was a New York Times best seller on the CIA’s “dirty wars” in the Horn of Africa which somehow failed to condemn this enormous crime.
“Every day some 3,000 Ethiopians flee their homeland, almost 100,000 a month, another million or more this year.”
Ethiopia remains the largest recipient of international, mainly western aid, in the world. Recently sources in Addis Ababa from within the offices of the IMF have sent word that Ethiopia’s import bill has reached almost 12 billion dollars a year while exports are only $2 billion. $10 billion a year in “aid,” “loans” or “investment” make Ethiopia entirely dependent on foreign good will to survive yet the world is helpless to prevent the enforced starvation of hundreds of thousand or over 10 million Ethiopians fleeing their country?
In the past ten years we have seen many reports on over two million Iraqi refugees and now another more than 2 million Syrian refugees. Yet more than twice this number of Ethiopian have become refugees and this fact remains unknown to the world?
When speaking of these crimes I am not speaking in the past tense for every day some 3,000 Ethiopians flee their homeland, almost 100,000 a month, another million or more this year. Many flee by boat from the shores of Somalia, heading for Yemeni shores and hopefully on to safer lands. How many boats sink with the loss of almost all onboard, or worse yet, have their passengers thrown overboard while still offshore will never be known. The international navies that patrol this region seem to care little for preventing the human trafficking mafias from carrying out their ghoulish trade, far to busy protecting the interests of the major shipping lines through these very same waters. Have you ever heard of a drone strike or commando raid on a human trafficking headquarters? Are any of these vermin trading in human misery ever listed on international “Most Wanted” bulletins?
Why should they, for the criminals ruling Ethiopia not only are allowed to continue business as usual but actually see their cash flow in the form of “foreign aid and investment” increased by a third since 2010 while at the same time hundreds of thousands of Ethiopians starve to death.
So next time you are confronted by images of lines of corpses along the shores of Italy remember that this is something that goes on almost everyday in the Horn of Africa but doesn’t merit comment, let alone disgust and outrage by those most pious of commentators in the international media.


Ethiopian Government Choking Muslim Unrest

BY ED MCKENNA,

Addis Ababa — The refusal by the Ethiopian government to redress grievances harboured by the Muslim community here, which comprises about 34 percent of the country's 91 million people makes this Horn of African nation vulnerable to extremism.
"If legitimate grievances are not met there is a risk that extremist violent elements will exploit those grievances to further their own aim," Mehari Taddele Maru, head of the African Conflict Prevention Programme at the Pretoria-based Institute for Security Studies, told IPS.
Ethiopia's Muslim community has been taking part in major demonstrations over the last two years against the country's ruling regime for alleged interference in its religious affairs. The majority of Ethiopians are Christian.
The mass protests have been non-violent but the Sep. 21 terror attack by the Somali extremist group Al-Shabaab on Kenya's Westgate Shopping Mall raises questions about the spread of Islamic extremism here, as there are growing concerns that radicalists could exploit grievances if they are not addressed.
Ethiopia's Salafist Muslims accuse the government of having infiltrated the country's most important Islamic political institution, the Ethiopia Islamic Affairs Supreme Council, arresting its religious leaders and replacing them with government-approved preachers from the Al Habashi sect.
The Al Habash sect is widely regarded as a moderate alternative to extremist Islamic doctrines such as Wahhabism, while Salafists are Sunni Muslims with a strict and puritanical approach. The Salafist reform movement has been spreading in Africa and in Ethiopia's Muslim community over the last few decades.
Twenty-nine Muslim leaders have been arrested over the last two years including religious leaders and protest organisers.
The best strategy to diffuse potential extremism in Ethiopia is for the government to address existing grievances and avoid conflating legitimate demands with an onset of Islamic radicalism, says Terje Østebø, an East African Islamist Reform movement expert at the Center for African Studies at the University of Florida.
"There is this dangerous presumption that when Muslims protest for their rights that they are under the influence of radicals. Much of the debate within Islamic society in Ethiopia is about politics of recognition. Young Muslims are trying to find their identity as both Ethiopian and as a Muslim," he told IPS.
During the Eid al-Fitr holiday in August, thousands of Muslims gathered in Ethiopia's capital Addis Ababa demanding religious rights. One of the protestors, who was beaten along with his wife and child for holding a placard that read 'Release our Leaders', was indignant over the government's response to the rally. He refused to give his name to IPS due to fear of repercussions.
"We are peaceful Muslims protesting against this government for arresting our leaders. We are not extremists. Our teachers are not extremists. We do not want the government controlling our religious lives. We feel that we do not have any religious freedom. They beat us, shoot us and arrest us. We have no religious rights in this country," the protester told IPS.
On Aug. 4, 14 Muslims were shot dead by government security forces during an attempt to arrest a local Imam in Central Ethiopia. The government has come under fire from international human rights organisations for its heavy-handed reaction to demonstrators.
"The government continues to respond to the grievances of the Muslim community with violence, arbitrary arrests and the use of the overly-broad Anti-Terrorism Proclamation to prosecute the movements' leaders and other individuals. This is a violation of people's right to peacefully protest, as protected in Ethiopia's constitution. The Ethiopian government must end its use of repressive tactics against demonstrators," Claire Beston, Amnesty International's Ethiopia researcher, told IPS.
The government has continued to accuse protestors of being extremists under the influence of foreign-backed radical ideologues.
"These protestors want Ethiopia to become an Islamic state and for us to release their teachers. They have been arrested for conspiracy to commit terrorism as this is what they are advocating with support from the Middle East. We will not engage with the protestors' demands, as we do not negotiate with terrorists," Shimeles Kemal, the Ethiopian government spokesperson, told IPS.
A report released in June 2013 by the European Parliament revealed how Wahhabi and Salafi groups in Saudi Arabia are working to "support and supply arms to rebel groups around the world."
There are good reasons for Ethiopia's government to fear the prospect of extremism taking root in the Muslim community, says Mehari.
"The Horn of Africa has the third-largest Muslim population in the world and has become increasingly volatile due to the war being waged inside Somalia against Al-Qaeda linked terrorist organisation Al-Shabaab, which has declared jihad on Ethiopia several times," he said.
In 1996, Al Ittihad al Islamiya (AIAI), Somalia's erstwhile foremost terrorist organisation, bombed several hotels in Addis Ababa, killing five people.
Centred in Somalia, the Al-Qaeda-affiliated group sought to establish an Islamic state that would incorporate all of Somalia and portions of Ethiopia, Djibouti and Kenya.
Although the AIAI base was effectively dismantled by the Ethiopian military, five Somalis were sentenced to death in 2002 for carrying out a series of bomb attacks in Ethiopia.
Since Ethiopian troops joined the U.S-backed invasion of Somalia in 2006, there has been no retaliatory action taken by Somali terrorists against Ethiopians. This suggests high security and a lack of capacity to mobilise Al-Shabaab operations in Ethiopia, says Mehari.
"They have a lot of willingness to attack Ethiopia, they just don't have the capacity due to fighting counter insurgency forces. Counter terrorism is also very strong in Ethiopia because of world leaders regularly attending the African Union in the capital. The instinct to identify risk and danger in hotels and shopping centres makes an incident like Westgate very unlikely," Mehari said.
However, the Ethiopian government may be making itself vulnerable to extremist influences by not engaging with demands for independent mosque elections inside the country's Islamic Affairs Supreme Council.
"There has been a pattern of Salafist extremists using local grievances to recruit Muslims in Mali, the Sahel region and other parts of Africa. In Ethiopia there is sufficient reason to believe that there is a minority group of extremists who will use domestic grievances to further their own political agenda," Mehari said.
The government's reluctance to engage with the Muslim rights movement is also consistent with the country's autocratic leadership strategy, says Østebø.
"This regime has maintained its power by limiting any space for political opposition and civil society to move in. The demands being made by Ethiopia's Muslim community are secularist, non-violent and part of a Muslim rights movement that is far from being extremist," Østebø said.